Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge
Fort Ruby National Historic Landmark
Go to
official website
Bird
checklist for Ruby Lake NWR
Ruby Lake
NWR is Audubon Important Bird Area
Great Escapes in the Great Basin
Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge
By James Clark
At one time, wildlife at Ruby Lake National
Wildlife Refuge in northeast Nevada was anything but a first priority. The
remote refuge was a recreational wonderland to about 30,000 boaters a
year, and water skiers were often a more common site across the open water
of the desert marsh than the waterfowl it was established to protect. In
fact at one point a section of the marsh was pumped dry to maintain
sufficient depths for boating in another section.
But all that has changed. Now the motorboat
season and engine size are strictly regulated--the result of a lawsuit and
a U.S. District Court ruling which prioritized the interests of wildlife
over the interests of boaters.
Not a lake, but rather a vast open-water marsh,
the 37,632-acre refuge includes 17,000 acres of wetlands with bulrush and
grass-covered islands. Like neighboring
Fish
Springs National Wildlife Refuge, some 100 miles to the east in Utah,
Ruby Lake NWR is a Great Basin oasis that depends on a fresh supply of
water. The water comes from over 150 springs at the base of the Ruby
Mountain range on the western edge of the refuge. The watershed is closed,
so all water entering the marsh is clean and pure. The water that gushes
from a cave behind refuge headquarters is so clean that it needs no
treatment before being piped to the office and residences.
Ruby Valley is actually a basin within the basin
that once contained 300,000-acre and 200-foot deep Franklin Lake. Ruby
Lake is one of two wetland remnants of that ancient lake. It is said
that early settlers misnamed the valley in the notion that red garnet
stones they found scattered about were rubies.
By Executive Order in 1938, President Franklin D.
Roosevelt established the Ruby Lake NWR. Twenty percent of the refuge was
apportioned from public land, and the remainder was purchased with the
Migratory Bird Conservation Fund for slightly over $200,000 (about $7 per
acre). The refuge habitat was recognized for its importance for ducks,
geese, grouse, sandhill cranes, and shorebirds.
Waterfowl & Wildlife
Of special interest are the canvasback and
redhead nesting areas in the prolific bulrush of the South Marsh, a
natural depression at the south end of the refuge. This area has the
highest canvasback nesting density of anywhere in North America.
During the years of flood and drought extremes, breeding birds were forced
to nest elsewhere and managers were concerned about their success with
limited wetlands.
Among the other waterfowl species that nest in
the marsh are Canada geese, trumpeter swans, gadwalls, lesser scaups, and
cinnamon and blue-winged teals. Migrating waterfowl stop at the refuge
beginning in mid-August, but most are gone by October because, unlike
Fish
Springs' marshes, most of Ruby Lake's marshes freeze during the
winter.
Migration appears to be cause for a decline in
resident trumpeter swan populations. Established in the 1950s with
transplants from Montana's
Red
Rock Lakes NWR, the birds are now apparently joining flocks that
travel to nesting areas farther north.
Western, eared, and pied-bill grebes are refuge
nesters, as are great blue herons, American bitterns, and black-crowned
night herons. Refuge biologist Jeff Mackay spotted the refuge's first
little blue heron in 1993.
Mackay would like to see more shorebirds, but he
knows how susceptible they are to fluxuating water levels. Impressive
numbers arrive only when melting snows flood the shallow playas. Because
they depend less on shallow water for feeding, long-billed curlews,
killdeer, and common snipe are common. Abundant prey, supported by both
marsh and uplands, attract red-tailed hawks, golden eagles, great horned
owls, and prairie falcons.
Despite the harsh winters, some 60 bird species
are tallied in the Christmas bird counts. Resident species include the
rather scarce sage grouse, horned larks, black- billed magpies, and
bushtits. A total of 207 bird species are recorded on the year-round
refuge bird list.
Mule deer are the most common big mammals.
Pronghorn antelope, introduced into the valley by the state of Nevada in
1988, are seen only occasionally. The abundance of coyotes, according to
Mackay, is probably due to plentiful prey, including blacktail
jackrabbits, which are hunted by the raptors as well.
Mackay surmises that coyote predation is the
reason that sandhill cranes do not fledge their colts at Ruby Lake. In
1992, 17 juvenile birds never made it to flight stage. One colt was
fledged in 1994 for the first time in 9 years. The parent birds maintained
a territory close to refuge headquarters, which, Mackay thinks, afforded
protection from predators.
In 1995 Mackay began a radio-telemetry project
to monitor the whereabouts of sandhill crane colts.
Tiny transmitters attached to the birds' legs emit homing signals and
enable Mackay to investigate losses and identify the causes. The research
will be used to justify appropriate control measures for later
implementation. The project is modeled after one conducted at
Malheur
NWR in Oregon, where, surprisingly, mink were a major predator; along
with coyotes, owls, and eagles.
Fishing
Large-mouth bass were introduced in the South
Marsh in 1932. By the 1940s, Ruby Lake NWR was recognized as one of the
top 10 bass-fishing locations in the United States. The bass flourished
while the relict dace, a fish native to northeast Nevada and once abundant
in the marsh, declined precipitously. Now the bass have declined as well.
A fisherman from Elko, Nevada, blames the loss of
"fabulous" fishing on wildlife biologists who wanted to get rid
of the fish because, as he said, "They don't consider fish to be
wildlife."
Overfishing, however, was the main culprit, says
former refuge manager Dan Pennington, exacerbated by several severe
droughts and cold winters. Mackay reports that more rain and changes in
the state fishing regulations to facilitate maturation of bass are helping
to bring the population back.
Anglers used to account for more than 90 percent
of the 50,000 annual refuge visitors, and they still account for 70
percent of the current 10,000 annual visitors. Wildlife observation and
photography draws the second biggest group. Selected dike roads are open
for observation, and a county road offer over 15 miles of refuge viewing.
Seasonal hunting is permitted for only migratory birds including ducks,
geese, coots, common moorhens, and common snipe.
Interior vs. Defenders of Wildlife
Fishermen were particularly upset during the
1970s, when an influx in recreational boaters caused a sharp decline in
fishing productivity. Defenders of Wildlife, a national conservation
organization, and refuge biologists had other concerns with the
speedboats--harm to nesting ducks and the destruction of submerged
vegetation.
Refuge biologists developed regulations that
restricted motorboats before August 1 and limited motor horsepower to 10
or lower after August 1. The Interior Department issued regulations
instead that moved the restricted date to July 1 and placed no limit on
horsepower.
Defenders went to court over this regulation, won
a restraining order against the DOI, and sued again after DOI still failed
to limit horsepower. Eventually they won a permanent injunction against
DOI. The biologists' original regulations were adopted in 1977, and have
been in effect ever since.
Forging a Better Refuge
To establish more quality waterfowl habitat, the
refuge has embarked on the first phase of an improvement project for one
of several areas that were diked by the post-World War II Civilian
Conservation Corps.
The East Marsh was divided by a new dike for
better water control and reconfigured to create island and open-water
areas.
Besides limited water-level control and
prescribed burns, the other principal management tool employed at Ruby
Lake is grazing by domestic animals-- a practice strongly defended by
Pennington. The main advantage, he says, is that domestic animals can be
used on an "as needed" basis. In addition, grazing reduces the
need for and postpones the need for burning. Light grazing also prevents
grass matting which, he says, is useless to any species.
Directions
From I-80 at Wells: US-93
south, right on NV-229, left turn on County Road 767 to Ruby Valley
approximately 35 miles to refuge (mostly gravel road).
From I-80 at Elko: NV-
227 toward Lamoille, south on NV-228 through Jiggs, left fork (gravel
road) through Harrison Pass (unpassable in winter), right on County Road
767 to refuge.
Source: GORP website. |
Ruby Lake National Wildlife Refuge
Fort
Ruby 1862-1869

A History of Fort Ruby
In May 1860, Co. B of the 4th Artillery assigned to
Camp Floyd, Utah, was sent to
Ruby Valley to find and establish a camp base to use to protect
the Overland Mail Route and its passengers and others from Indian
attacks. On Sept. 4, 1861, Col. E. P. Connor organized the 3rd
Regiment of California Volunteers. A year later he received orders
to patrol the Central Route of the Overland Mail Company. The site
chosen for Fort Ruby is on the eastern side of the southern end of
the Ruby Mountains in Ruby Valley, Nevada. The Fort was situated
about 2 1/2 miles southeast of the Overland Mail Station on a six
square mile plot of ground. The Fort's northern boundary was on the
dividing line between what are now Elko and White Pine Counties in
Nevada. The site was approximately midway if the 600 miles
separating Carson City, Nevada and Salt Lake City, Utah.
Col. Edward P. Connor and seven
companies of soldiers (about 600 men), 55 wagons, 2 howitzers,
carriages for some of the officer's families, 3 ambulances and the
regimental band departed Camp Halleck, Stockton, California, on July
12, 1862, and began marching east. They arrived at Fort Ruby on the
evening of September 1, 1862. Fort Ruby was officially established
pursuant to orders # 8 dated September 4, 1862 by Col. Connor.
Soldiers immediately began to gather stone and
timber from the nearby mountains to build store houses and winter
quarters. Living quarters were log cabins of hand hewn logs either
laid horizontally or vertically and heated by fireplaces. Stables
and store houses were built of vertical logs in a stockade fashion
with the posts set vertically in trenches. Corrals were constructed
of adobe. A good sized pond, fed by a spring, supplied the Fort with
fresh water.
After 1865, Indian raids became infrequent and in
1869, the Army determined that Fort Ruby was no longer necessary. On
instructions of Headquarters, Department of California, San
Francisco, dated July 15, 1869, Fort Ruby was ordered to be
abandoned. On September 20, 1869, the men of Co. I 9th Infantry and
all of their supplies were transferred from Fort Ruby to Camp
Halleck some seventy miles to the north.
Most of the abandoned building at Fort Ruby were
sold to nearby ranchers. Thomas Short of Cave Creek is said to have
bought several of the structures and moved them off the Fort. Some
of the buildings or parts of them may still be being used on ranches
today.
Fort Ruby was never declared a military reservation
by Executive order. In 1961, the U. S. Dept. of the Interior gave
landmark status to Fort Ruby. Only two original buildings, an
enlisted men's barracks and the officer's quarters were remaining in
1992 when they were both lost to history when they were destroyed by
a fire.
Fort Ruby is located in the south end of Ruby Valley in White Pine
County. |